
28 min • 6 lectures
Female founders receive approximately 2% of total venture capital funding. Inspired by the critiques of columnists like Arwa Mahdawi, the program examines why this disparity remains constant despite data showing women-led companies are often more capital-efficient and yield higher returns. The curriculum rejects the idea that this is a simple 'pipeline problem' or a lack of female confidence. Instead, it analyzes the structural 'Glass Cliff,' where women are frequently only offered leadership roles when a company is already failing. It also investigates how investment committees use different questioning styles for men and women, focusing on growth potential for men and risk mitigation for women. This systemic bias shifts the burden of change onto individual women rather than the financial institutions themselves. The investigation explores the influence of Limited Partners—the pension funds and endowments that provide the capital for venture funds. If these entities do not demand diversity, the venture capital ecosystem remains unchanged. This lack of diversity leads to the 'FemTech Ghetto,' where essential products for half of the population are labeled as niche markets. The final sections move beyond performative allyship toward structural rewiring. Topics include the rise of female-led VC firms, the importance of sponsorship over mentorship, and the use of alternative financing like bootstrapping to bypass traditional gatekeepers. The focus is on a fundamental redistribution of capital and legal accountability rather than life-hacks or corporate platitudes.
The 2% Reality Check: Mapping the Funding Gap
The Glass Cliff: Leading on the Edge
Deconstructing the 'Confidence Myth'
The LP Power Dynamics: Following the Money
The FemTech Ghetto and the Niche Trap
Beyond Allyship: Rewiring the Ecosystem